The essay topic idea is the backbone of your paper, and if it is weak, it will be extremely difficult for you to succeed. The best topic ideas are the ones that you are most passionate about. If you do not care about your subject, the essay is going to be torture for you to create Argumentative Essay Example #1 Should Fast Food Come With a Warning like Drugs? You can get fast food on almost any street nowadays. Fast food and junk food are everywhere you look, and the world is only creating more fast food shops around the globe. They save the environment and our eco-friendly. They are less expensive than traditional At our cheap essay writing service, you can be sure to get credible academic aid for a reasonable price, as the name of our website suggests. For years, we have been providing online custom writing assistance to students from countries all over the world, including the US, the UK, Australia, Canada, Italy, New Zealand, China, and Japan
How to Make a Photo Essay (with Pictures) - wikiHow
That, more or less, is the short answer to the supposedly incredibly complicated and confusing question of what we humans should eat in order to be maximally healthy. Essay about traditional food long, a dense cloud bank of confusion moves in. Sooner or later, everything solid you thought you knew about the links between diet and health gets blown away in the gust of the latest study.
The year before we learned that dietary fiber might not, as we had been confidently told, help prevent colon cancer. Just last fall two prestigious studies on omega-3 fats published at the same time presented us with strikingly different conclusions. Remember the rule? But before I do that, it might be useful to figure out how we arrived at our present state of nutritional confusion and anxiety.
The story of how the most basic questions about what to eat ever got so complicated reveals a great deal about the institutional imperatives of the food industry, nutritional science and — ahem — journalism, three parties that stand to gain much from widespread confusion surrounding what is, after all, the most elemental question an omnivore confronts.
Or, for that matter, an eater. And so, like a large gray fog, a great Conspiracy of Confusion has gathered around the simplest questions of nutrition — much to the advantage of everybody involved. Except perhaps the ostensible beneficiary of all this nutritional expertise and advice: us, and our health and happiness as eaters. More important than mere foods, the presence or absence of these invisible substances was now generally believed to confer health benefits on their essay about traditional food. Foods by comparison were coarse, old-fashioned and decidedly unscientific things — who could say what was in them, really?
But nutrients — those chemical compounds and minerals in foods that nutritionists have deemed important to health — gleamed with the promise of scientific certainty; eat more of the right ones, fewer of the wrong, and you would live longer and avoid chronic diseases.
It essay about traditional food thought that that was pretty much all there was going on in food, until doctors noticed that an adequate supply of the big three did not necessarily keep people nourished. No single event marked the shift from eating food to eating nutrients, though in retrospect a little-noticed political dust-up in Washington in seems to have helped propel American food culture down this dimly lighted path, essay about traditional food. Epidemiologists also had observed that in America during the war years, when meat and dairy products were strictly rationed, the rate of heart disease temporarily plummeted.
Naively putting two and two together, the committee drafted a straightforward set of dietary guidelines calling on Americans to cut down on red meat and dairy products. Within weeks a firestorm, emanating from the red-meat and dairy industries, engulfed the committee, and Senator McGovern who had a great many cattle ranchers among his South Dakota constituents was forced to beat a retreat. A subtle change in emphasis, you might say, but a world of difference just the same. dietary essay about traditional food. Second, notice how distinctions between entities as different as fish and beef and essay about traditional food have collapsed; those three venerable foods, each representing an entirely different taxonomic class, are now lumped together as delivery systems for a single nutrient.
The linguistic capitulation did nothing to rescue McGovern from his blunder; the very next election, inthe beef essay about traditional food helped rusticate the three-term senator, sending an unmistakable warning to anyone who would challenge the American diet, and in particular the big chunk of animal protein sitting in the middle of its plate.
Henceforth, government dietary guidelines would shun plain talk about whole foods, essay about traditional food of which has its trade association on Capitol Hill, and would instead arrive clothed in scientific euphemism and speaking of nutrients, entities that few Americans really understood but that lack powerful lobbies in Washington. This was precisely the tack taken by the National Academy of Sciences when it issued its landmark report on diet and cancer in Organized nutrient by nutrient in a way guaranteed to offend no food group, it codified the official new dietary language.
Industry and media followed suit, and terms like polyunsaturated, cholesterol, monounsaturated, essay about traditional food, carbohydrate, fiber, polyphenols, amino acids and carotenes soon colonized much of the cultural space previously occupied by the tangible substance formerly known as food. The Age of Nutritionism had arrived. Ideologies are ways of organizing large swaths of life and experience under a set of shared but unexamined assumptions.
A reigning ideology is a little like the weather, all pervasive and virtually inescapable. Still, we can try. In the case of nutritionism, the widely shared but unexamined assumption is that the key to understanding food is indeed the nutrient. From this basic premise flow several others, essay about traditional food. Since nutrients, as compared with foods, are invisible and therefore slightly mysterious, it falls to the scientists and to the journalists through whom the scientists speak to explain the hidden reality of foods to us.
To enter a world in which you dine on unseen nutrients, you need lots of expert help. But expert help to do what, exactly? This brings us to another unexamined assumption: that the whole point of eating is to maintain and promote bodily health. So there is at least a question as to whether nutritionism is actually any good for you. Another potentially serious weakness of nutritionist ideology is that it has trouble discerning qualitative distinctions between foods.
Similarly, any qualitative distinctions between processed foods and whole foods disappear when your focus is on quantifying the nutrients they contain or, more precisely, the known nutrients.
This is a great boon for manufacturers of processed food, and it helps explain why they have been so happy to get with the nutritionism program. The Year of Eating Oat Bran — also known as — served as a kind of coming-out party for the food scientists, who succeeded in getting the material into nearly every processed food sold in America, essay about traditional food.
Here comes omega-3! So depending on the reigning nutritional orthodoxy, the avocado might be either a high-fat food to be avoided Old Think or a food high in monounsaturated fat to be embraced New Think, essay about traditional food. The fate of each whole food rises and falls with every change in the nutritional weather, while the processed foods are simply reformulated. EAT RIGHT, GET FATTER So nutritionism is good for business.
But is it good for us? You might think that a national fixation on nutrients would lead to measurable improvements in the public health. But for that to happen, essay about traditional food, the underlying nutritional science, as well as the policy recommendations and the journalism based on that science, would have to be sound. This has seldom been the case. Well, kind of.
corn syrup we could consume. Which turned out essay about traditional food be quite a lot. Oddly, America got really fat on its new low-fat diet — indeed, many date the current obesity and diabetes epidemic to the late s, when Americans began binging on carbohydrates, ostensibly as a way to avoid the evils of fat, essay about traditional food. Why this should have come as news is a mystery: as long as people have been raising animals for food, they have fattened them on carbs.
But there are a couple of problems with this revisionist picture. First, while it is true that Americans post did begin binging on carbs, and that fat as a percentage of total calories in the American diet declined, we never did in fact cut down on our consumption of fat.
Meat consumption actually climbed. We just heaped a bunch more carbs onto our plates, obscuring perhaps, essay about traditional food, but not replacing, the expanding chunk of animal protein squatting in the center. How did that happen? I would submit that the ideology of nutritionism deserves as much of the blame as the carbohydrates themselves do — that and human nature.
By framing dietary advice in terms of good and bad nutrients, and by burying the recommendation that we should eat less of any particular food, it was easy for the take-home message of the and dietary guidelines to be simplified as follows: Eat more low-fat foods. And that is what we did. BAD SCIENCE But if nutritionism leads to a kind of false consciousness in the mind of the eater, the ideology can just as easily mislead the scientist.
Most nutritional science involves studying one nutrient at a time, an approach that even nutritionists who do it will tell you is deeply flawed, essay about traditional food. If nutritional scientists know this, why do they do it anyway?
Because a nutrient bias is built into the way science is done: scientists need individual variables they can isolate. Yet even the simplest food is a hopelessly complex thing to study, a virtual wilderness of chemical compounds, essay about traditional food, many of which exist in complex and dynamic relation to one another, and all of which together are in the process of changing from one state to another.
This is what we mean by reductionist science. Scientific reductionism is an undeniably powerful tool, but it can mislead us too, especially when applied to something as complex as, on the one side, a food, and on the other, a human eater. It encourages us to take a mechanistic view of essay about traditional food transaction: put in this nutrient; get out that physiological result.
Yet people differ in important ways. Some populations can metabolize sugars better than others; depending on your evolutionary heritage, you may or may not be able to digest the lactose in milk. The specific ecology of your intestines helps determine how efficiently you digest what you eat, so that the same input of calories may yield more or less energy depending on the proportion of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes living in your gut.
There is nothing very machinelike about the human eater, and so to think of food as simply fuel is wrong. Researchers have long believed, based on epidemiological comparisons of different populations, that a diet high in fruits and vegetables confers essay about traditional food protection against cancer.
So naturally they ask, What nutrients in those plant foods are responsible for that effect? One hypothesis is that the antioxidants in fresh produce — compounds like beta carotene, lycopene, vitamin E, etc. It makes good sense: these molecules which plants produce to protect themselves from the highly reactive oxygen atoms produced in photosynthesis vanquish the free radicals in our bodies, which can damage DNA and initiate cancers.
Indeed, in the case of beta carotene ingested as a supplement, essay about traditional food, scientists have discovered that it actually increases the risk of certain cancers, essay about traditional food.
Essay about traditional food oops. It could be the vagaries of human digestion. Maybe the fiber or some other component in a carrot protects the antioxidant molecules from destruction by stomach acids early in the digestive process. Or it could be that we isolated the wrong antioxidant. Beta is just one of a whole slew of carotenes found in common vegetables; maybe we focused on the wrong one. Or maybe beta carotene works as an antioxidant only in concert with some other plant chemical or process; under other circumstances, it may behave as a pro-oxidant.
Indeed, to look at the chemical composition of any common food plant is to realize just how much complexity lurks within it. When William Prout isolated the big three macronutrients, scientists figured they now understood food and what the body needs from it; when the vitamins were isolated a few decades later, essay about traditional food, scientists thought, O.
But who knows what the hell else is going on deep in the soul of a carrot? The case of the antioxidants points up the dangers in taking a nutrient out of the context of food; as Nestle suggests, scientists make a second, related error when they study the food out of the context of the diet.
The trace of limestone in the corn tortilla unlocks essential amino acids in the corn that would otherwise remain unavailable.
Some of those compounds in that sprig of thyme may well affect my digestion of the dish I add it to, helping to break down one compound or possibly stimulate production of an enzyme to detoxify another. We have barely begun to understand the relationships among foods in a cuisine.
Yet nutritionism encourages us to look elsewhere for the explanation: deep within the meat itself, to the culpable nutrient, which scientists have long assumed to be the saturated fat. Of course thanks to the low-fat fad inspired by the very same reductionist fat hypothesisit is entirely possible to reduce your intake of saturated fat without significantly reducing your consumption of animal protein: just drink the low-fat milk and order the skinless chicken breast essay about traditional food the turkey bacon.
So maybe the culprit nutrient in meat and dairy is the animal protein itself, as some researchers now hypothesize. The Cornell nutritionist T. Willett suggests, it could be the steroid hormones typically present in the milk and meat; these hormones which occur naturally in meat and milk but are often augmented in industrial essay about traditional food are known to promote certain cancers.
This is of course precisely what the Essay about traditional food committee was trying to tell us.
British Food . Learn English
, time: 2:592 Argumentative Essay Examples Help You To Start Writing You Essay
The essay topic idea is the backbone of your paper, and if it is weak, it will be extremely difficult for you to succeed. The best topic ideas are the ones that you are most passionate about. If you do not care about your subject, the essay is going to be torture for you to create Good persuasive essay topics can be difficult to come up with, but in this guide we’ve created a list of excellent essay topics for you to browse. The best persuasive essay ideas will be those that you are interested in, have enough evidence to support your argument, and aren’t too complicated to be summarized in an essay Jul 20, · Toll Free No: +1 E-mail: help@blogger.com Get best Philosophy Essay Writing Service by the expert writers of Instant Essay Writing, we provide best writing services to students. Traditional Method – This method is basically a conventional method. In traditional method mainly raw food is purchased
No comments:
Post a Comment